That "under 18" is the problem. They've established a criteria that can not be objectively enforced because it can not be objectiively defined. It sounds good legally, on paper, but any figure that objectively fits the criteria for "post-pubescent" could be said to look at least 18 so it's impossible to determine if they are a minor. That's why I suggested what I did. It gives room for artistic freedom but it's based on real differences in human development stages and most importantly it can be objectively evaluated. Anyway, I've gotta go. It's been fun bouncing this stuff around. And for the record, I'm trying to be constructive rather than slam anyone. I sure hope I didn't come across that way. ;-)

Before they made me they broke the mold!
http://home.roadrunner.com/~kflach/