Humm, I just read Blackhearted's post and I have to agree with most of it. I think the biggest problem is that NO_ONE is using P6 to it's full potential! Even the company that makes/sells it doesn;t!

THe P6 figures, sadly, should showcase P6's features but don't. They have excess mesh density where it's not needed. Not one takes advantage of the displacement mapping capability and the SS features. You;d think the company making the software would be the first to make use of these, not the last, leaving it to hobbiests to figure how to impliment them. Tese features should be, by now, fully documented and implemented, not just being explored after all this time.

Basically what I';m trying to say is that the biggest reason, in my opinion, that people are still stuck in the older versions, is that they don't realize just what they are missing, and that is largely the fault of the company making the porgram!

mike