apology accepted, mike. check my gallery here - there's no poser stuff in it :lol: apparently your point is still unclear, as you seem to be arguing not only with those who disagree with you, but also with those who agree with you. my opinion is that nobody is harmed if all of the below are true: 1. nobody is forced to look at a b-t-k pic 2. the b-t-k pic is not a photo of an actual human 3. there are no legal technicalities, e.g. copyright or trademark violations 4. the image is not a blatant TOS violation