Quote - in Rendo's and the mods who removed my images defense,they did NOT say it was child porn,just underaged nudity ,meaning that they viewed the character to be under 18.

I just wanted to point that out,since this thread has lingered to the child porn issue  :0)

:) Oh golly I feel silly. So this is really just a matter of following the rules. Like, if there was a rule about not showing hotdog buns in your gallery, and you went and did it (you rebel, you), then you would chastized and chastened. Or a rule against pictures of, say, oak trees, and the admins decided that your attempt to create a sycamore had veered FAAAAR too close to looking like an oak tree for their taste.

A clarification: When I said, "Naked children are obscene," I meant "They [the Puritans creating the rules] consider naked children obscene." Myself, I consider Dick Cheney obscene, and the war in Iraq, and the non-compete awards going to Halliburton, and the refusal to address global warming, and ignoring Avian Flu until Rumsfeld secured stock in a company that made a government-supported "vaccine," and having an official in charge of women's health issues charged by his own wife with multiple counts of anal rape, and... well, not naked children, who are generally cute and a pleasure to watch -- like squirrels or kittens playing, not Carmen Electra miming fellatio.

But this is, as Xen is always eager to point out, the best of times in the best of all possible worlds, and there are other places to post pictures of that real world the body-hating Talibans infecting the planet would like to heap and burn, with a few bad women on the pyre for propellant.