Quote - Well it does state in the TOS the following and i believe the mods have the rights to remove any image the find are going against any of these guidelines.

• Child Image Guidelines:
• No Child Nudity: Images of children or characters resembling children (including teens, pre adolescent, child like fairies and other imaginary figures) under 18 years of age, depicting nudity are no longer permitted.
• No child nudity of any kind which includes exposed chest on females, buttocks or genitals.
• No images in which characters under the age of 18 give the appearance of having no clothes.
• No use of: transparent clothes, blurring of nude areas, or the use of 'blots" or 'Censored" wording or props to cover areas that are otherwise not clothed.
• No depictions of young humanoid characters/children giving the appearance of being under the age of 18 displayed in erotic, seductive, provocative poses or context.
• Babies in diapers will be allowed. Toddlers fall under the child nudity section.
• Since age is difficult to identify with 3D images, this will be at the discretion of the Renderosity team.
• Gender that is questionable on an image with an exposed chest will be removed from the gallery at the discretion of the Renderosity team.

If anyone post an image of a child that is showing any nudity of any kind then they should at least expect said image to be removed.

 

 

so what your saying is never voice an opinion against the rules?

i'm pretty sure some of the rules in the tos were put there because of what members said or thought, surely it's possible some could be changed through the same means...unlikely from what i've seen but possible

billy