Quote - I still find it wrong to issue a warning for removing a picture if it is in ANY way debatable whether or not it was depicting a nude CHILD In those cases: Remove the image, but DO NOT issue a warning. It's not fair to put a black mark on someone's record (no matter how removeable it is) for doing something so subjective.

I completely agree. Otherwise the situation is positively Kafkaesque - one cannot predict the whim of the moderator, so one has no idea whether one is commiting an infringement or not.

Actually it's already Kafkaesque in the volume of rules on how much of which bits of a body must be covered up, for what "apparent age", for something that isn't even a human being. It would be easier to go out in the street undressed than post an image here!