*I still find it wrong to issue a warning for removing a picture if it is in ANY way debatable whether or not it was depicting a nude CHILD In those cases: Remove the image, but DO NOT issue a warning. It's not fair to put a black mark on someone's record (no matter how removeable it is) for doing something so subjective.

There are cases where you're dealing with OBVIOUS children, and in that case, a warning is in order, but when we're talking Aiko/Hiro pics... it's not on to issue a warning.*

Thank you for making this suggestion, I can see your point. I will be discussing this with the team and the admins.

Just to remind all, we do review images as a panel to ensure we get a majority viewpoint before removing images. Otherwise we do run the risk of the "moderator's whim" situation. (The only time we wouldn't need to review as a panel is if there was absolutely no question on age, such as the mil baby being used completely naked.)

And Lisbeth, sorry you were misinformed about retracting warnings. Or perhaps it was before the decision was made. At any rate - any member wanting their warning reviewed can contact admin@renderosity.com for consideration.

Karen :-)

 

---

"you are terrifying
and strange and beautiful
something not everyone knows how to love." - Warsan Shire