Quote - ehh, no worries.

i dont know. this argument has raged for years and the situation is going to get a whole lot worse before it gets any better. thank some people for constantly pushing and probing the rosity guidelines for renderosity's resulting heavy-handedness on the matter. i still stand behind my post on the pornstar faeries though.

all i know is that when i morph my next legal teen character it will be based on the V3 mesh as opposed to the aiko or preteen one since apparently the base mesh heavily determines if its child porn or not, regardless of what age character youve morphed it into. which is rediculous, IMO - the final product should be evaluated, not the mesh or texture it happens to be based on and bears no resemblance to. if i wanted to, i could morph a preschooler out of the poser dog... does that mean its not childporn, but a render of a naked hairless dog? :rolleyes:

i actually said it could be done out of jabba the hut lol. what im saying is the mods should have a guidline that they use realistically as an individual mod. i'm also saying that when a mod states the rules of child nudity were changed to cover even those images they think are okay because a few people crossed the line that it isn't a rule as such . they just changed the goal posts cos of over work. if someone cant say this is a pic of a child in the nude or semi nude for girls then how can a conclave of mods say its so. we all know what a kiddy pic looks like. if they're put up ban the fuckers who post em but to say we changed the line cos a few people steeped over it is purile

and on that not i'm off to bed.

billy