geoegress opened this issue on Sep 14, 2006 · 76 posts
XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 15 September 2006 at 12:43 AM
Oh....its repugnant, alright. Personally, it's not something that I would choose to crow about like a strutting rooster. Most people would frankly find the things that this ruling at least cracks the door open for to be utterly disgusting.
As for grownups and conversations -- most grownups would find this particular conversation to be nauseating at its core.
The Supreme Court has made its ruling -- for now. Nowhere does that ruling say that a website named Renderosity is hereby compelled to have fae creatures of any age in its galleries -- nude or otherwise. That's an attempt to take a......twisted........definition of "free speech" -- and turn it into FORCED speech. Which isn't free at all.
The warped suggestion that this Supreme Court case means that a website like Rendo is somehow compelled to allow the posting of underage-appearing figures is simply asinine at its base.
It'll be challenged. And with different justices sitting on the Court this time. There are plenty of people with plenty of money who will see to that.