Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: OT- SUPREME COURT and Poser- The final word

geoegress opened this issue on Sep 14, 2006 · 76 posts


XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 15 September 2006 at 1:22 PM

I just don't have the time to get back into this at the moment -- I'm a bit preoccupied with drawing up a lighting layout for a new university communcations center building -- complete with TV studios.  So this post will, of necessity, have to be short.  Perhaps I can get into more detail several hours from now.

Others are making excellent points & contributions anyway.

@lmckenzie -- re: the ACLU position on KP - for now I'll just refer you to my responses in the other thread.  A Clintion-esque non-denial denial is not a denial.  Saying that "we don't support KP" -- and then going on to effectively say that it should be made legal......that's nothing more than a great example of how oiling oneself well prior to squeezing through a sewer manhole might help to keep the......dirt......off.  While, of course -- denying that the dirt is dirty.

But I have to give you credit, mckenzie:  you don't use the tactic of going for the personal-level attack.  At least I haven't seen you do that.  Perhaps we can discuss something.

@mickma --  I don't have the time to deal with your obessive black-helicopter-style fantasies in regards to conspiratorial "neocons" at the moment.  No doubt, when you sleep you have recurring nightmares about leering, moustache-twirling neocons in the neighborhood -- hiding behind your bushes, peeking into your windows, trying to figure out how best to ruin all of your fun.  Don't worry -- there isn't a neocon boogeyman hiding in your closet at midnight.  There's no need to hide under the covers -- or under the bed.  Besides -- getting under the bed is potentially dangerous in and of itself.  There might be a neocon lurking there in the darkness.

Quote - rreynolds -- I seem to recall that another law had a rider that made such images illegal and cannot recall which one, but it seems to have been done in a way that did not contest the earlier Supreme Court ruling.

 

If that's true, then it's news to me.  I haven't heard of any mollifying legislation actually being passed.  And even if it has -- it has yet to be tested by the courts sigh.

Well -- back to the communications center.  Y'all have fun without me. 😉

Something To Do At 3:00AM