This has been a very interesting discussion. But I have always been, and still am, perplexed as to exactly what is a pornographic image of a child. As far as I can determine there has not been a universal hard and fast rule established. Is an image pornographic if it shows: A nude child from the rear? A frontal view of a nude child? Or does it become pornographic only when the genitals are blatantly featured. I don't think there is any doubt that both real life and artistically created images portraying sexual interaction are pornographic, but, the big question is, are the artificially created images to be considered harmless legal entertainment for adults or not????