Yes, a I think reasonable person sans a preordained agenda (if you can find one) could see it as a "child." The seductive part is perhaps more subjective. For all I know, that (partial) expression might be considered something entirely different in some cultures but I don't think seeing seductive there is unreasonable. Is it against the TOS? Who the hell knows anymore. File a complaint and maybe they'll pull it, perhaps depending on how much revenue the merchant brings in, or who the mods are or what the goat entrails tell them. How about a just little hand with Care Bear nail polish beckoning? Even with negative nudity held constant, you still have two independent variables, age and seductive/suggestive.  Do a quick calculation and you'll see that we're soon down the rabbit hole with Alice. But we all know that Lewis Caroll had a thing for little girls :-)

"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken