now your putting words in my mouth. i stated that the tos are the tos and guidelines are simply that i never said they were'nt helpful. to quote guidelines as part of the tos would be a bit missleading.

i'm saying ...if the tos is  re the under 18's is so good why do some mods (part of the admin) and some members think theres one rule for MP and one for the galleries? if i go in the bar and i don't look 18 i get asked for id..if i have no id i get refused booze. the bartender doesn't spin me round for all the staff to see and say...does he look 18 to you lot. a rule that can;t be followed by one mod using his/her own discretion makes it a very very ambiguous rule to start with. that mods from different parts of the site react differently to each other...ie the market place and the poser gallery (as stated by a mod) further shows it to be an ambigous and in some ways unfair rule in the implimentation of. why bring in an eduactional program into the thread. it isn't about whether or not people get educated though that they do is good. with such ambiguity it's a necessity lol. it's about why do some admin think theres one rule for galleries and one for the MP. why do some mebers think the same. doesn't it bother you the admin that they do think this way.  doesn't it show that somehwre the rule is either being enforced unequally with one are of rendo using different criteria than another.

telling members they can let us do a review......yes but with this rule i've seen two or more mods and an admin have to say let us vet first.......and the fact that they should have to on the grounds they aren't sure if it will be a violation or not shows the rule again to be an ambiguous one.  i was told the line was changed from allowing certain things to not allowing certain things by a mod because a few people crossed a line. is that how rules work...someone breaks the tos and the interpitation of the rule gets stricter....sorry but i can't see the logic of it.  i take it based on on what i put in the post you won't review the impimentation of the rule...but please don't say you don't understand what i'm saying. i have a ten yr old boy who's watching what i type and he understands the premise of my request. i asked him how old was the girl in the ad and hes said 14...i asked him what he thought of it...he said shes being sexy and giggled......the site is rife whith these kind of what i find inoffensive images but according to the tos they break the rules. it does seem the mp gets away with it on a much broader base than some of the galleries. to say some slip through the net seems odd ...no where near as many seem to slip through the poser forum net...maybe they should mod the MP as well.

billy

obviously like acadia you think i'm on a soap box so i'll say no more on the subject...i just hope the next time it comes up people like acadia and others don't cry about it as they did at the beginning of the thread that started it all and then say oh gosh do they really have two sets of rules....they must have if a mod says they do. next time i see someone lose an image i shall laugh extrememly loudly and think tough shit