Quote - Does anyone else think the TOS is too restrictive for an art site? For example, there is a series of very good pictures in the  rosity gallery which portray the horrors of rape, No I'm not giving a link, Now under the TOS,

(Posting Unacceptable Images or Writing Themes:

• No Rape [actual or implied]

this is not allowed. Also, there is some great art, modern and classical that would not be allowed here while been entirly acceptable for viewing in public galleries all over the world.

i think the tos per say is as reasonable as can be expected for a site that has to try and cater to a multitude of genre and poeple. it isn't a psecialised artsite such as renderotica or some of the others. as for the sabine woman which for me was one of rubens best works.....if you can paint that well you won't i assure you want to put it in a redorosity gallery.  you have to remember that this isn't an art museum.  whilst i have  to admit that some pics such as you mention get through the net..._(modding has to be a pissy job to do at the best of times.) i have been know to disagree with two sets of tos and how some of the tos is implimented. that said on the whole i still have to give em

9 and 1/2 out of ten. it's a vast site and can't be too easy to police. i would never give an url to get something removed though if it was of child porn  i'd feel duty bound to do so.

billy