I think the discussion should be re-focused: what is art? How do you define art? What is your objective?

(For example; the Marxists believe that art is a mirror of the society/just as science is another mirror, etc. etc).

So, go on, look at your pieces. Are they "art" in the sense that you/others define art? Do they make an artistic statement, carry value, message - or are they just titillation?

I think these are the questions and not the task of defining what is pervert or not.