Melen opened this issue on Oct 14, 2006 ยท 18 posts
thundering1 posted Sun, 15 October 2006 at 10:47 PM
Bummer!
Well, give this a shot (let's rule something else out, shall we?) - take a succession of bracketed images from clearly overexposed to clearly underexposed, in 1/3rd stop increments of shutter speed while maintaining the same aperture. Get a complete tonal change example. Pick something static like the shot above, and use a tripod. I would actually call that one underexposed - and it's also where noise gets more pronounced.
Underexposure is devastating in video, which is where digital photography got its starting ground, and still shares some like-traits in that respect.
Get them back into Photoshop and see if there's any difference based on exposure.
Good luck!
-Lew ;-)