Primal opened this issue on Oct 23, 2006 · 732 posts
billy423uk posted Tue, 24 October 2006 at 10:48 PM
sorry ladona i never meant to imply bills work was porn, i'm sure it isn't. but it looks like some thought it depicted someone under 18. nakedness in itself and within art doesn't worry me but i guess the mods have to cater for everyone including kids. the mere fact they have to try and cater for everyone means some won't get catered for. your loyalty to bills art is commendable.
billy