Forum: Community Center


Subject: Rules unclear and unfair

Primal opened this issue on Oct 23, 2006 · 732 posts


TheAnimaGemini posted Wed, 25 October 2006 at 5:26 AM

Quote - To clarify, having an image removed due to violation of the child nudity guidelines is in no way equal to creating child porn.
At All.
All it means is that you've violated our Child Image Guidelines.  We've removed quite a few very innocent images that, because they violated the Guidelines, had to go.  And, yes, if many of the old masters, who painted cherubs and young babies in the nude, were to post their art here, it would be removed on those guidelines.  We here do not say what is and is not Art.  We do, however, say what is acceptable for our site.

MS

Child Porn??? Excuse me, but between porn and nudity is a big hole.
But okay, i understand. But sorry i have to laugh. You removed great art from your site because you think ist violated the child nudity guidelines,  and i am sure this image we are talking about was not  break the child nudity guidelines ,the other side is i can see here a lot of hardcore violence on images in the galleries, Michael whith holes in his head and another nice things.
But nobody cares. Sorry but this is for me pervert.

La vie est éternelle. L'amour est immortel.

“Dwell on the beauty of life. Watch the stars, and see yourself running with them.”
― Marcus Aurelius,