Rules and Guidelines are only good IF they are used in a consistent manner.  The thing about determining the AGE of some Poser characters is subjective at best.  Just searching the gallery for AIKO does bring up ALOT of discrepancies. (At least to me.)  Hey, but that's just MY perception.

So, what If a possible TOS violation is not initially perceived as one?  That’s would be a pretty major chink in the chain, RIGHT?

Ok, let say I'm a Poser mod/coord and its my night/shift to scan the gallery for issues.  I come across a Nude of Aiko, she sort of, kind of, looks 16ish to me (face wise), but I figure that’s pretty close to 18, so what the hell...just let it go! 

So, are there any checks and balances  in place to ensure that an image is not overlooked in this way?  Do all the gallery images with the Content Advisory flags get escalated for a group vote?  If not, maybe they should be.  At least this way, images are being reviewed by more admin, instead of just one or 2 staff members.

This could possibly save RR and it valued members a whole lot of  grief, but again that's just my perception of things.

Now where is that 2 cents?