Jim, I understand what you meant... no harm, no foul. Just wanted to avoid confusing those reading this thread that are still trying to get a grasp on it. It's easier, for both the tutor and tutoree, to explain it correctly the first time then to have both get frustrated because of the misuse of a term. Trying to save from headaches on both sides... :)

Dean is correct. Being as ALL methods of ERC are based on the code of FBM's, so too will they fall victim to the plague of cross-talk. I also couldn't agree more with Dean's assesment... just reading may turn your brain to mush, but once you get down and dirty, and you get it to actually work... it become SOOOO clear.

Oh, to have logics would be nice... AND/OR/NAND/NOR/XAND/XOR (we already have NOT to an extent by way of "-"). Not only that, but to also have multiple dependencies...

-Rob
rbtwhiz.com