Funny, I just read the results of an elaborate test about alternative ink cartridges. The main conclusion is that if you're primarily printing text, or if you settle for less quality, you can save an average of 27% with the no names. For printing photos however, the brand names are the best of the test... stating that the no names aren't as resistant to light and humidity. For HP printers, there are hardly any alternatives available, and if so, they are practically the same price. For Canon printers, the original ones are far superior for quality photo prints (also better drying time and longevity), but also the priciest; for text, Pelikan is the best alternative at a good price. Epson printers: same thing, originals are superior for photos. Again, Pelikan is the best alternative, but less light and water resistant. This test was made on original photopaper of the corresponding printer brands. Refills were not considered reliable and not included in the test. The test was done in Belgium, so possibly Pelikan isn't available where you live, and Costco wasn't included in the test. Interesting: 81% of the consumers here use the original brandnames; 13% use alternatives (of which only 54% are happy with them); 4% uses refill kits...

We do not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs ǝʍ