Forum: Community Center


Subject: Rules unclear and unfair

Primal opened this issue on Oct 23, 2006 · 732 posts


Unicornst posted Thu, 16 November 2006 at 9:15 AM

Why is it everytime someone wants  to challenge or question the rules here, someone has to pop up and say "If you don't like it, you're free to leave"?

Has no one ever challenged or questioned state or federal laws? If they did, were they told they were free to leave the country?

People have the right to challenge and question. We do live in a democracy, after all. And just because they do challenge a rule or law THEY  believe is unfair does not mean they do not like the place they are. Quite the opposite. It's because they DO care about the place they are in.

One of the reasons given for the rules being changed was because of "consistency between the marketplace and the community". So I think it's fair that if you have nude Aiko in the MP and clothing for her that is near nude or extremely provocative, that you can question the deleting of images that use those products. Where's the consistency?

If the other reasons given, "feedback from the community and the legal liability surrounding child nudity and pornography", were to stand alone, then there might not be questioning. But that particular reason was thrown in there also. Therefore, questioning and challenge happens.

Some also question or challenge the judgement made in removing particular images. One using Aiko as a nude fae passes approval. Another by the same artist using the exact same character does not. Why? What's the difference in them? This actually requires questioning on exactly where the line is drawn. What made one okay to have posted here and the other not okay when both images were basically the same?