Forum: Community Center


Subject: Rules unclear and unfair

Primal opened this issue on Oct 23, 2006 · 732 posts


CrimsonDesire posted Fri, 24 November 2006 at 2:50 AM

Quote - Well, I think we should all gather up at the local church and burn every thing Aiko!  

I was just wandering through the galleries and thought to myself "ooh they let that go by and that, and that".   There is so much here that looks like the underage Aiko nudes and I'm inclined to think, that either the mods are sleeping or we are starting to look at nude Aiko in a different light.

I'm not sure, someone clear this up for me, because I'm just going "wow, that's risque" but the images still remain...answers please.

If it's the case of mods sleeping well that happens....no one's perfect.

If it's the latter, perhaps some message where we can all know.

 

I think if I read the previous posts right that the mods typically only view specific images if there is a complaint about said image, or if it happens to be done by someone who is on a watch list for previous misconduct or stuff like that.

No doubt the advise will be that if you have a specific complaint about a image to let them know via PM or something.

I'd also point out that all viewpoints are subjective.  What you see as a potential underage version of A3 might not be seen the same way by the folks making a decision as to if a image stays or goes on that or any other bases.  So it is also possible that the images in question were previously viewed, reviewed, and judged not to contain potential underage nudity content or other material that violates the TOS guidlines by the staff.

Finally I don't mean to appear antagonistic so please don't take it that way, but I am alittle curious.  What exactly motivated you to start combing the galleries looking for potential underage nude renders of A3?  Just wondering.