as i said before, the bad image of poser comes from the bad poser images everywhere. amen. (btw - i am not trying to justify the rude behaviour of this guy, although i have to confess that his words:"Shit from Poser is not your work, get the goddamn Hell off of my Internet. Learn a fucking talent, loser." cover pretty much of what i feel when browsing the galleries.) soooo, accordingly the poser users uploading crappy pics are responsible - and consequently renderosity, being the host of the galleries. now what if rosity would shift/del all that crap to increase quality? all the faithful members of this community would run off to some other sites and within a couple of months rosity would be as dead as an old mans pants. that means that this site is not dedicated to show art but to make some big fat money. and when you look around the web, all this poser thing is the commercialized part of CG. it's pop, so to say... well, and some people just don't like pop..... you mentioned brit before...when you put a bullet in her neck, stuff her with hay and put her somewhere next to your tv-set you can enjoy all her qualities without having to suffer the flaws. imo, she stands for:make-people-pay-for-their-stupidity. (to pay for crap is stupid!) on the other hand, although i never met this man, the death of j.l. hooker left a hole in my life. sex vs feelings? pop vs quality? i don't like my hobby being commercialized. A. ps - i had my hair red too (and some other hues as well) - well, ages ago...just made me paranoid;)