TrekkieGrrrl opened this issue on Nov 25, 2006 ยท 61 posts
arcady posted Tue, 28 November 2006 at 7:39 PM
Well... As I've said elsewhere;
Sounds good in the announcement...
...But...
Will the figure be 'anatomically correct' (down below), at least for regular and distance shots, or will we once again be seeing a plethora of funny looking morphs trying to stretch too few vertexes into varying levels of inaccurate detail
That's really all the current female gen-3 figures are lacking.
It's not that I want the ability to do 'R-otica' zoom-ins, but I would like a female figure in the millennium line that when standing normally undressed doesn't look like a cartoon. I'd like one that looks at least as decently correct as the males.
Truth has no value without backing by unfounded belief.
Renderosity
Gallery