In fact the old slow film procedure had, in most of the cases, this advantage: photographers were more committed to 'get it right the first time', to avoid the need to reshoot and the extra costs... With digital photography, you can see the results immediately and correct your mistakes on the spot. In general, that was not the case when shooting film (except the professionals who had the privilege to take Polaroid tests first). You really were forced to make less errors... But I do think that digital has more possibilities, and that photographers who know what they're doing, will get just as beautiful results as they did in the old days (nostalgic preferences aside).

We do not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs ǝʍ