Quote - You make it sound like the guy is cutting your gonads off by just making the simple (and obvious, and correct) observation that V3 has a tiny head in proportion to her body.  Absolutely nobody including Stahlratte has suggested that you can't illustrate human beings any way you care to - only that the default V3 scaling is very unrealistic.

 
   I never said he was wrong in his proportions, But what I heard was how bad V3 renders. We are talking about a Charature that is given away, A program that is at a price that everyone can afford. And we get how bad she looks when she is rendered, And if you don't render the person the "Ideal way" She is incorrect. Read his comments. 

   But if you render her not using his standards she looks terrible. I'm sorry, I disagree. No she is not perfect. But I can also look at what he has made in his Ideal porportions and say, I like V3 better. (note: I didn't say I was right) That can be my opion, and mine alone, I didn't saying mine is the only way you can make a rendered V3 characture look good. That is the basis of his argument. Which I accept, but that is not the final word.

   The one thing that he says that you can't get around is if you make V3 8 feet tall along a 6 foot man and try and make her look the same hight using different camera lense settings, you can't hide her hight  within a room that is furnished as example, the furniture gives perspective, Her body or his will show a distortion happening trying to get her to be his same hight. 
   
   My complaint with V3 is she should be at least 3 inches shorter that the man. so when she is in High Heels she is the same hight. That has nothing to do with porprotions, that is sizing of the characture Which is the easiest to correct in the stock figure.