Ok, done reading.   The charecter was made to appear young and to not appear young, if asked the same question....I really couldn't give her an age.  Did I try to confuse and confound?  Yes, I did I didn't want the answer to be a simple "yes" or "no" from either side.  I wanted everyone to understand two points:

1.  It's not easy being a Mod
 
2.  This charecter coudl have went either way, had I given her a gun (as one person suggested) the desicion would have been easier.  I picked the clothes to further confound, the plushie to distract and make people assume, the legs and breast for the same reason opposite point.  Determining Aiko's age isn't easy, and with some morphs very, very hard but if the Mods correspond with those put on "Banning/warning" trial, is silly, when they could just as easily remove the image...and state why.  No matter how many times or at very wost a week's banning but permanent?   

To the Mods, if she did not have a top, would I have recieved a warning?  If it had been my third warning and she was topless would I have been permantly banned?

To all, do you think if she was topless and this was my third incident that I should have been permantly banned?

Capn' give the folks a chance to answer/respond and then I think I'm in the need of a kitty break (even tho' Cat's don't support the troops)