Quote - I see your point, in that "where does it stop?" when submitting images for approval. But all I can fall back on is that it comes down to common sense,Out of the thousands of images posted in the galleries, only a relatively small amount get pulled, and many times, are of the same artists.

 

One only has to look at the remaining thousands that do not get pulled as a barometer of what is, and what is not acceptable.

 

The suggestion to submit images to the staff, was for potentially controversial images. If one cant take the time to look at the remaining acceptable art, and pushes the responsibility off on the staff by suggesting a change in the TOS is the solution, well...that's just plain irresponsible IMO.

 

Thousands of others successfully do it every day

 

Tom

 

Gee Tom, had you chimed in and said this 587 posts ago, this thread would be on Page 8 by now.

To me , it's all interpretation and perception...what does the viewer percieve in the image to report it, and how does the mod team evaluate it.  What is used as a benchmark?  A biology book?  Personal feelings?...personal perceptions?  At what point do the mods assimilate into one mind during reported image review and come to a conclusion?  Or is it simply a matter of majority vote?  Take this recently uploaded image as an example...

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1345391

Now to me, she looks to be 14-16 years of age, to another she may look to be 24.

You say tomato, I say tomahtow - lol