Quote -
by this logic those who are the fiercest opponents of rape or  pediaphilia are latent rapists and pedos. how absurd.

 
It is absurd because that isn't a logical progression/ equivalent.

Quote -   in fact the above statement is so absurd i'm still giggling. i've heard this staement made many times and you know who expresses it the most.  homosexuals.

 

A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy because a person's interests and circumstances have no bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made. While a person's interests will provide them with motives to support certain claims, the claims stand or fall on their own. It is also the case that a person's circumstances (religion, political affiliation, etc.) do not affect the truth or falsity of the claim. 

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

The statement about anti-homosexuals being latent homosexuals is based on a study that showed that self proclaimed anti-homosexuals became sexualy aroused when shown gay porn. they were less aroused than when shown heterosexual porn.

My Homepage - Free stuff and Galleries