Attached Link: Link to Perfectly Innocent Cupid Babies

After reading this incredibly long thread as carefully as possible, I still just want to know one thing:  should I bother to submit my extremely innocent and utterly luscious cupids and putti based very loosely on the DAZ Mil Baby but lovingly painted by me with their little butts and nether regions covered up with swags of cloth and whisps of cloud and flowers?  Or will the most unutterably stupid rule in the world prevent me from marketing this great product here as well as in my own store?

I'm sorry, even after reading all this sheer  nonsense, I just can't believe there is anything remotely wrong with naked babies and I would find it a mark of true moral cowardice and the lowest form of (real) pandering to view imagery like this in any but the most innocent light. 

What is, after all, considered NUDITY AMONG BABIES/PUTTI/CUPIDS/CHERUBS?  Is it when their little cherubic butt cheeks show a little bit?  Or is it when their baby chests are not covered?  Or maybe if they have a little bit of a flirty look on their faces?  What if the cracks in their little baby asses are carefully disguised in the promos with clouds?  But then . . .somebody might say that they clouds IMPLY underlying nudity.

Yanno . . . mal y soit qui mal y pense.  

And . . . how could someone find out in advance of the interminable testing routine here whether this obvously innocent product would get the heave ho?

Dana Sitarzewski
Jaguarwoman Designs
http://www.jaguarwoman.com