The vertex count issue is hopefully only relevant with the current method used by the script.  What you suggest (injecting a lo res?) would only seem to work after we already have some sort of vertex mapping, if we're talking about intensifying vertcounts.  Otherwise we wouldn't know where to put those new verts.  But Spanki (and Ockham) is right... the vertcount issue should be irrelevant if the method under discussion works as hoped.

As far as subdividing the correlations by materials or groups, I think that may help, even with what Spanki is outlining (which I hope to be able to implement...).  I've added the foundations for such comparisons of materials into the geom class.  It would probably require that the user specify which materials in the source to correlate with which materials in the target, because naming will differ between cases.

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.