Elfwine opened this issue on Jan 09, 2007 · 31 posts
Acadia posted Wed, 10 January 2007 at 6:05 AM
Quote - Getting your hopes up for a computer with more than 1 CPU which has duel cores, or more? Microsoft's greed has crushed those hopes. From the Inquirer we have this: By INQUIRER newsdesk: Tuesday 09 January 2007, 15:32 INTERESTING SNIPPETS from Microsoft's licence terms for retail software reveal that the software maker insist that users must assign their copy of the upcoming operating system to what Microsoft terms one "single device". The device, the outfit helpfully explains, is a "physical hardware system". A hardware partition or blade is considered to be a separate device, the fimr notes. The terms state that the software may be used "on up to two processors on that device at one time." This may of course will cause much stratching of heads with innocent users as they are persuaded to buy more multi-core and multi-processor systems in the future. With chip makers happily cobbling together more and more processors to achieve more apparently parallel cores, the definition of what constitutes a single processor may need tightening up if we're to avoid volish copyright cops banging on too many doors. AMD eight-core anyone?
Are you sure they have the right information? Doesn't sound right to me. This is from MS's site regarding licensing of OS for a multicore processor:
Quote - Server software licensed on a per-processor basis for systems with multicore processors requires only one software license per processor
It's talking "multicore" processors, not multiple processors.
"It is good to see ourselves as
others see us. Try as we may, we are never
able to know ourselves fully as we
are, especially the evil side of us.
This we can do only if we are not
angry with our critics but will take in good
heart whatever they might have to
say." - Ghandi