SoulTaker opened this issue on Jan 10, 2007 · 17 posts
sandman_dreaming posted Thu, 11 January 2007 at 4:20 PM
Personally, I don't see 'nude boobs' as porn - to me classing them as such seems kinda narrow-minded. In effect your statement means that every woman is thus classified a porn star by virtue of the fact she has breasts, which is clearly nonsense. Your assertion also condemns thousands of years of art ( from, for example, classical Greek sculpture to, say, Impressionist nudes ) to being porn, which was clearly not the intention of the artists creating their work and probably says more for your attitude towards the naked human form.