Quote - True, but, as I said earlier...had there been no bitching, I'm willing to bet every drop of blood in my body that it would still be up there.  Supid policies come into place when pepole can't use their common sense.

 

I agree with that, since the total lack of tolerance for others is what put these policies in place. If they people that had a problem with the thumbnails could have had tolerance and respect for the opinions of others then they would've just set the nudity filter in their profile and eliminated the problem without having to affect everyone else. How is that using common sense or courtesy for that matter to force their opinions on everyone else because they're offended?

If they were so concerned about thumbnails of the featured artist in the newsletter, why didn't they use common sense and just use an alternative like the avatar of the artist instead of insisting it was a factor in getting rid of the thumbnails?

If they wanted to promote artists, why would they be so dishonest in trying to pawn off a sanitized version instead of using common sense to give a true representation of the image? It makes you wonder who they're trying to promote it to and which artists they're trying to promote?

If they used any comon sense or tolerance for others then none of this would be necessary but that seems to be gone the way of the dinosaur. Those that replace them will have only "joy joy feelings for everyone around them" since "The future is a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiener"

Click to get a printed and bound copy plus T-shirts, mugs and hats