wheatpenny opened this issue on Jan 22, 2007 · 112 posts
zonkerman posted Mon, 29 January 2007 at 11:34 PM
An interesting question drifterlee. I'm sure there are various opinions as there are various levels of violence. Which is more violent, a picture of someone plunging a sword into the chest of a living thing or a picture of a dead thing next to someone who slayed them? I would think the first case to be more violent. However, if in the second case the deceased victom was depicted in a gross decapitated manner such that their condition was gruesome, like a chopped off head with oozing blood all over the place and veins dripping it out (eww), then I would consider that to be overly detailed violence for some. Perhaps if we could see what the entertainment industry defines as rated PG, PG13, and R then we would have something to measure by.