DDevant opened this issue on Jan 24, 2007 · 140 posts
Spiritbro77 posted Tue, 30 January 2007 at 4:51 PM
You're quite right. It's my opinion. Nothing more ,nothing less. But come on Stacey, don't you think it's a bit messed up to exploit Davinci's name, only to later remove one of his images because of some puritanical rule against nudity? If you're going to exploit the masters, then at least show some respect for their work. :)