I'm with you there, Timberwolf. Whilst I did'nt bring it up in my last post, there is a huge difference between nudity and porn - whatefver age the subject is. To say that a  nude image of a cartoonesque person who might look underage if you squinted hard enough is child porn is ridiculous - pornogrpahy is in the intent to titillate or cause arousal, and I'm not sure how a simple nude image could do that without an eortic or sexual context.

Whereas judging by the few pictures I looked at at your site, Gaby, are certainly in a sexual or erotic context. I have no way of knowing which images you attempted to show here in the gallery, but based on the few pictures I saw, I believe the admin were right to ask you to remove them from this site.

Note that this is not condemning your imagery, or decrying porn as filth - as Timberwolf said, each to their own. But to claim that your images weren't sexually graphic, and then that a simple standing nude of an Aiko texture is somehow kiddy-porn? That's frankly ludicrous.

jonthecelt