I'm not going to take sides on this - Renderosity (or any website) has the authority to define and enforce its own rules.  Them the breaks.

Now the part that I want to see is how Rendo will define 'nudity' with respect to animalia in general or so-called 'cat-people' (humans masquerading as animals or animals with very human characteristics).  Or even animals in general!  Do fur, feathers, or other natural bodily covering accutriments count as clothing - or are they still naked/nude?  This point can then be taken further - is sufficient pubic hair considered natural covering or is it still nudity?  Can I post fully-erotic pictures of horse-sex?  Not as defined by the ToS.  Then a 'scientific' rendering of the mating between, say, dragonflies is against the ToS - very sad, but not my place to say otherwise (!)

It will get perposterous after a while.  If you want to post 'nudity' or nature-sex without restriction, you'll have to find another venue for your images.

It's this or Renderosity will have to consider a more determined segregation of gallery images - maybe an adult gallery where you have to not only be a member to enter, but have provided some proof of age - which is always problematic and prone to ...well... litigious probabilities.

Make your own site with your own gallery and keep nudging people over to it if the ToS is too Draconian.

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone