Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: OT: Apple's PC & Mac guy commercials and Vista

JHoagland opened this issue on Feb 18, 2007 · 126 posts


Penguinisto posted Mon, 19 February 2007 at 10:31 PM

Quote - I do a lot of very "serious" things on my computer.  That's why I haven't bothered with Vista.

If the whole Apple commercial thing isn't Macs vs. PC, then there are a number of commercials in the series that make no sense at all.  And, why call the other character "PC"?

I'll lay it out in a simple chain: * Linux, FBSD, Solaris and the like on PC hardware doesn't suffer the same maladies. * But, most folks think "Windows" when they think "PC's", no? Therefore - the Apple ads are a hit against Windows primarily, with the likes of Dell and HP as secondary targets. > Quote -

I disagree with you on the "smokescreen" argument.  You are welcome to the opinion, but I don't see it as based on fact. 

While there are no statistics per se, there is enough logic to support it (again, I refer you to Apache vs. IIS). > Quote - Either the OS is immune from attack or it's not.  Either it's an attractive target to those who want to do a lot of damage, or it's not. 

You're speaking in absolutes when security threats are much less clearly defined. Specific corporations and entities are attractive targets to theives, blackmailers, and other organized criminals. Generic home users are attractive targets to Bot-Herders, who are in it to rack up a large distributed network of slave machinery for subsequent sale or rent to the highest bidder (spammers, DDoS artists, what-have-you). > Quote - If the reason isn't market share, then I'd love to hear what is.

Three words: Ease of penetration. If I'm out to compromise any given number of machines, which is easier: a) an operating system with numerous and ongoing flaws which can be easily exploited over a network, or... b) operating systems which require a higher level of skill and patience (not to mention risk of detection) to co-opt Either way, the number of users are in the hundreds of millions. Put this way: If Linux were easy to infect with something, one could very easily co-opt millions upon millions of high-bandwidth 24/7 server-based targets. Instead, we find script kiddies going after machines which may or may not be on when needed, may or may not even have a broadband connection, and may or may not have their hard drives flushed at any time due to a number of internal errors. HTH, /P