Cage opened this issue on Dec 20, 2006 · 1232 posts
Cage posted Fri, 23 February 2007 at 7:47 PM
Okay. What you say makes sense. I'm deriving the idea from the UVs, in which a direct transfer based on weighting after the texverts have been properly split reveals that the corresponding tri makes a difference. But it wouldn't matter in the case of deltas. Darn. I thought I had another morph correction trick.
In Poser, at least, the texvertices are not pre-split for every vertex. A vertex may have anywhere between 1 texvertex and one textvertex for each vertneighbor poly. So I have to split and weld the texvertices before I can work with the seams at all. It would be easier if what you say above were true, and that's what I had expected.
I think I can deal with the problem by sorting through edge neighbors, then. I have an idea of where I'm going....
===========================sigline======================================================
Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking. He apologizes for this. He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.
Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below. His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.