vulcanccit opened this issue on Mar 15, 2007 · 21 posts
danob posted Sat, 17 March 2007 at 7:40 AM
Ok Richard I thought you may have included the 17-40mm in your comparison.. Also I found the sample variations to be something that needs to be taken into consideration, as one was so much better than the other.. But I would certainly agree the the Sigma is wonderful value for money... And for the crop factor nothing to beat it if you get a good one!
Danny O'Byrne http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/
"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt