@3DVim -- as the policy has been told to me by a mod (which I can not remember) the image doesn't have to show nudity to need the nudity flag, it only need to be such that the person represented is represented such that one could expect they are nude as such in the reality represented in the representation... a figure standing behind a representation of a sign that says "I am nude" that covered the representation of the figure from toes to chin would be considered nude for the purpose of policy. It matters not that it might be a representation of a decapitated head on a pike hidden behind the sign, or an otherwise non-anthropomorphic robot with a human head, or a neutered bear wearing a berka and a man's head as a hat, what matters is that the figure might be imagined by some people (most especially the images creator) to be nude behind the sign. Fortunatly most people are utterly incapable of imaging nude digital bodies beneath digital representation of clothing... but to be safe you might want to un-click visible on body parts of a figure "covered" by representations of clothes.

That said... it is RMP's gallery certainly... I just don't understand why the mods can't click the nudity tag and formulate some inoffensive e-mail that says "Dear Artist, an improperly flagged image in your gallery has been flagged for nudity or violence. Thank you for your continued participation in a galleries :)"