Forum: Bryce


Subject: Opinions

airflamesred opened this issue on Apr 30, 2007 · 44 posts


dvlenk6 posted Thu, 03 May 2007 at 7:45 PM

Bryce is only partially integrated with D|S.
I wish it was fully integrated; and hope it will be.
Being able to pose figures/use content directly from within Bryce would be a major asset for the program. Being able to use 3DLight shaders would be good too; even if they are the watered down D|S ones. There are a few other features in D|S that I would like to see Bryce have.
Companies still say: Look what our software can do all by itself'.
Now, they also say: "Look what our software can do when used with other programs."
I like that. I'll never limit myself to one application. Compatability is important.


Content sales are big money, so I'd expect them to be prominent in marketing.
Using content doesn't lower standards. How many people can make sets as good as Stonemason (I'm just using him as an example, because he is so widely know, there's others too)?
Using one (or part of one) of his sets in a render isn't going to decrease the render's standard; it's going to increase it; because it is of such high quality.

Friends don't let friends use booleans.