PerfectN opened this issue on Jun 23, 2007 ยท 124 posts
stormchaser posted Sat, 23 June 2007 at 7:54 PM
"So far as the thumbnail policy goes and censorship, you can thank the hormone ridden ones who felt that they had to blow up a boob or buttock or crotch so that it filled 200 x 200 pixels worth of space in order to attract views."
Acadia - That's a good point & I understand how the galleries were looking. I just get annoyed when tasteful nudes are deemed inappropriate. Yes, I know the full image can contain nudity, I just don't see how a tasteful nude thumbnail is not allowed. Well, I can see only one reason to not show nudity here, & that's because of the minors. Any other reason is downright silly. Yes, as you say it can look a little tacky with every thumbnail showing nudes, but I still don't see enough reason in this to stop it. We choose to look or we choose to move on. At the end of the day we are talking about art here, not pornography. They are two very different subjects.