Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Interpretation of TOS

PerfectN opened this issue on Jun 23, 2007 · 124 posts


Conniekat8 posted Sat, 23 June 2007 at 10:50 PM

Quote - This has always been nonsense, and remains nonsense.  There were nudity and violence filters in place long before the thumbnail change.  This change is about making many people cater to the desires of a few people who are actually going out of their way to see nudity (filtering is on by default).

 

I actually like that policy change, because now I don't have to turn the thumbnails off... and I don't have to look over my shoulder to see if anone is snooping behind my back in the office and seeing a boob... or a large NUDITY ADVISORY label.  LOL, that label was more alarming and serious looking then seeing a boob lurking in a thumbnail.

I'd have an easier time explaining a boob flashing thumbnail by saying, oooh, how'd that get in there, then a repeating series of  'NUDITY ADVISORY' series of tumbnails.

Plus, images containing nudity are still required to be labeled as nudity, so whomever is going out of their way to see nudity still has a little hook they can follow.

Anyway, I don't mean to be combative, I just have a different outlook and opinions on those things.

[I'm off the soapbox, for real this time... I think...]

Hi, my namez: "NO, Bad Kitteh, NO!"  Whaz yurs?
BadKittehCo Store  BadKittehCo Freebies and product support