ockham opened this issue on Aug 07, 2007 · 41 posts
Cage posted Thu, 09 August 2007 at 3:19 PM
Hmm. I wonder if your inclusion of the figure section is making a difference. I'll try that. I think a good test would involve replacement with a geometry which needs to be welded. When I try to insert intensified buttock geometries, which will be welded, as alternates, Poser gets mixed up.
BTW, what's the difference between
storageOffset 0 0 0
and
storageOffset 0 0.3487 0
?
Could that make a difference when applying one of these poses?
Interesting.
===========================sigline======================================================
Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking. He apologizes for this. He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.
Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below. His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.