I think a lot of people here, as usual, are diverting attention from the real topic to one as genrealized as "should vicky have genitals". I see nothing wrong with labia or more detailed genitals. The problem is this: I have Eve. I think its a great model, with some amazing morphs. But has anyone else noticed that she has almost as many morphs for her genitals as she does for her face? Do we really need dozens of open vagina morphs for poser models? I dont think so. Im sure that open vagina/anus morphs are a hot seller at Renderotica, but I dont think they have a place in art. If you are using these models for realistic images or artwork, I understand why you would want more realistic looking genitals but why do you need an actual morphable cavity other than for erotic images/porn? Judging by the galleried most-viewed images (yes Im generalizing, there are exceptions) the majority of people come here to view naked women with large breasts in suggestive poses. While I have nothing against nudity or the trend in the galleries (to each his own), I do have something against people trying to justify having fully morphable and poseable vaginal/anal cavities on their poser models by saying that its necessary for 'art'. And yes, Michael does have genitals. But they arent morphable or poseable. They are there because there would be no way to create realistic nude images of him with just a texture/bump map. You dont need body cavities to create realistic nude images of Vicky, just a pubic hair texture/bump map or a transparency prop, with perhaps a morph to suggest detail.