beos53 opened this issue on Sep 20, 2007 · 30 posts
XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 21 September 2007 at 11:13 AM
For the OP -- I agree with those who have said that the shorter figure appears to be the older of the two........subjectively speaking, of course. But they both look like pure fantasy creatures -- they aren't realistic. So you can claim that they are 3,000 years old if you want to. Just don't post a nude image of a Maddie character in the gallery and then provide her with a virtual ID card which states that she was born in 3020 BC. I doubt that it would fly.
I've known short, child-seeming women in my time. Even dated a couple of them back when. They looked like china dolls -- devastatingly cute, though.
As a sidenote -- there's a legal issue that arises in the "real world", too. When models who look like children -- but who aren't -- are used to produce certain types of pictures.