Quote - Let's say I get a package with different formats: PP, P5 - Which one will work best for me (with P6)? I thought the PP stuff was best all along eeee :) hahahah Thanks guys, have a super Sunday!

Usually packages are split due to features used.  The big difference betwee ProPack and P5 was that Curious Labs added the Material room with the Pixels3D shader nodes.  P4 ProPack and previous versions had a much simpler, limited material structure.  So if the package has P4*/PP/P5 options, P5 is the best bet.

• Another thing that ProPack brought in was moving bump maps from BUM to regular images (PNG or whatnot).  The BUM bump map is a proprietary pseudo-hybrid normal-bump map (dizziness may occur reading that twice) used exclusively by Poser.  So when you see MATs with P4 or PP it usually is a difference in the bump map image type used.  The Gradient Bump node of the Poser Surface in the Material room is exclusively for BUM maps, ya know. ;)

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone